- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Case CX135 vs. John Deere 790
Case CX135 vs. John Deere 790
3 reasons to buy Case CX135:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 50 amperes and 42 amperes | 16 % more or 8 amperes |
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34301.4 kPa and 25994 kPa | 24 % more or 8307.4 kPa |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 117.2 l/min and 480 l/min | 76 % less or 362.8 l/min |
9 reasons to buy John Deere 790:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3100 mm and 2590 mm | 16 % more or 510 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 310 l. and 165 l. | 47 % more or 145 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 40 l. and 14.1 l. | 65 % more or 25.9 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 130 l. | 57 % more or 170 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 23 l. and 17.2 l. | 25 % more or 5.8 l. |
| Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 12 l. and 3 l. | 75 % more or 9 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 7.6 l. and 3 l. | 61 % more or 4.6 l. |
| Maximum torque | 698 Nm and 359.3 Nm | 49 % more or 338.7 Nm |
| Effective power | 116 kW and 70.9 kW | 39 % more or 45.1 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 13440 kg and 21972 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) |
| Manufacturer | Isuzu and John Deere |
| Model | AJ-4JJ1X, III Level III certified and e 400 lot |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer height | 2750 mm and 3000 mm |
| Unit load-transfer length | 7230 mm and 10000 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2590 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3100 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 7230 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 10000 mm |
| 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2750 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3000 mm |