- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Caterpillar 320D L vs. Volvo EC210BNLC
Caterpillar 320D L vs. Volvo EC210BNLC
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 320D L:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 410 l. and 350 l. | 15 % more or 60 l. |
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 35000 kPa and 34300 kPa | 2 % more or 700 kPa |
Engine oil volume | 30 l. and 25 l. | 17 % more or 5 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 110 kW and 107 kW | 3 % more or 3 kW |
Displacement | 6.4 l. and 5.7 l. | 11 % more or 0.7 l. |
Carrier
Maximum travel speed | 5.7 km/h and 5.5 km/h | 4 % more or 0.2 km/h |
7 reasons to buy Volvo EC210BNLC:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 11.6 rev / min and 11.5 rev / min | 1 % more or 0.1 rev |
Shovel
Maximum bucket volume | 1.6 m3 and 1.2 m3 | 25 % more or 0.4 m3 |
Operation
Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 50 amperes | 37 % more or 30 amperes |
Cooling system fluid volume | 27.5 l. and 25 l. | 9 % more or 2.5 l. |
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 19 l/min and 205 l/min | 91 % less or 186 l/min |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 295 l. and 260 l. | 12 % more or 35 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 20330 kg and 21500 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Volvo |
Model | C6.4 ACERT and D6D EFE2 |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 600 mm and 700 mm |
Images
Carrier
14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 700 mm |


