- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Caterpillar 349E vs. Case CX700
Caterpillar 349E vs. Case CX700
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar 349E:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 8.7 rev / min and 6.5 rev / min | 25 % more or 2.2 rev |
Carrier
| Track shoes number per side | 52 and 47 | 10 % more or 5 |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
8 reasons to buy Case CX700:
Operation
| Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 27 l. and 9.8 l. | 64 % more or 17.2 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 900 l. and 719.2 l. | 20 % more or 180.8 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 112 l. and 50 l. | 55 % more or 62 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 650 l. and 570.1 l. | 12 % more or 79.9 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 52 l. and 43.2 l. | 17 % more or 8.8 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 317 kW and 295.3 kW | 7 % more or 21.7 kW |
| Displacement | 15.7 l. and 12.5 l. | 20 % more or 3.2 l. |
Carrier
| Support rollers number on either side | 3 and 2 or 3 | 33 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 53297.1 kg and 69500 kg |
Motor
| Model | C13 ACERT and AH-6WG1X, III Level III certified |
Images