- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Caterpillar 349E vs. John Deere 160D LC
Caterpillar 349E vs. John Deere 160D LC
10 reasons to buy Caterpillar 349E:
Swing device
Swing torque | 148462.1 Nm and 43864.8 Nm | 70 % more or 104597.3 Nm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 719.2 l. and 320 l. | 56 % more or 399.2 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 50 l. and 22 l. | 56 % more or 28 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 570.1 l. and 196.8 l. | 65 % more or 373.3 l. |
Engine oil volume | 43.2 l. and 15 l. | 65 % more or 28.2 l. |
Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 9.8 l. and 5.7 l. | 42 % more or 4.1 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 295.3 kW and 90.2 kW | 69 % more or 205.1 kW |
Displacement | 12.5 l. and 4.5 l. | 64 % more or 8.0 l. |
Carrier
Track shoes number per side | 52 and 43 | 17 % more or 9 |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 7 | 22 % more or 2 |
1 reasons to buy John Deere 160D LC:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 13.3 rev / min and 8.7 rev / min | 35 % more or 4.6 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 53297.1 kg and 17920.5 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and John Deere |
Model | C13 ACERT and 4045H |
Carrier
Support rollers number on either side | 2 or 3 and 2 |
Images


