vs.

      Caterpillar 349E vs. Volvo EC140BLCM

      10 reasons to buy Caterpillar 349E:

      Operation

      Cooling system fluid volume 50 l. and 20.3 l. 59 % more or 29.7 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 570.1 l. and 205 l. 64 % more or 365.1 l.
      Engine oil volume 43.2 l. and 15.5 l. 64 % more or 27.7 l.
      Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume 9.8 l. and 3.8 l. 61 % more or 6.0 l.
      Fuel Capacity 719.2 l. and 260 l. 64 % more or 459.2 l.

      Motor

      Full power 322.1 kW and 73.1 kW 77 % more or 249.0 kW
      Effective power 295.3 kW and 69.4 kW 76 % more or 225.9 kW
      Displacement 12.5 l. and 4 l. 68 % more or 8.5 l.

      Carrier

      Rolling bearings number on either side 9 and 6 33 % more or 3
      Track shoes number per side 52 and 42 19 % more or 10

      1 reasons to buy Volvo EC140BLCM:

      Swing device

      Rotation speed 11 rev / min and 8.7 rev / min 21 % more or 2.3 rev

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Working weight 53297.1 kg and 15150 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Caterpillar and Volvo
      Model C13 ACERT and D4D EBE2

      Carrier

      Support rollers number on either side 2 or 3 and 2

      Images