- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Caterpillar 385B L vs. Volvo EC360BLC
Caterpillar 385B L vs. Volvo EC360BLC
7 reasons to buy Caterpillar 385B L:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1241.6 l. and 620 l. | 50 % more or 621.6 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 101.1 l. and 65.4 l. | 35 % more or 35.7 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 79.9 l. and 41 l. | 49 % more or 38.9 l. |
| Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 18.9 l. and 6 l. | 68 % more or 12.9 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 382.5 kW and 137.2 kW | 64 % more or 245.3 kW |
| Displacement | 15.8 l. and 12.1 l. | 23 % more or 3.7 l. |
Carrier
| Support rollers number on either side | 3 and 2 | 33 % more or 1 |
3 reasons to buy Volvo EC360BLC:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 9.7 rev / min and 6.2 rev / min | 36 % more or 3.5 rev |
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
| Track shoes number per side | 50 and 47 | 6 % more or 3 |
Neutral reasons:
Motor
| Model | Caterpillar 3456 ATAAC and D12C EDE2 |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 4.5 km/h and 4.5 km/h |
| Shoe dimensions | 762 mm and 600 mm |
Images
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 762 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm |