- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Caterpillar 390D L vs. Link-Belt 240LX Long Front Part
Caterpillar 390D L vs. Link-Belt 240LX Long Front Part
9 reasons to buy Caterpillar 390D L:
Swing device
Swing torque | 259999.8 Nm and 69702.6 Nm | 73 % more or 190297.2 Nm |
Operation
Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 19 l. and 6 l. | 68 % more or 13 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 1240 l. and 340 l. | 73 % more or 900 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 101 l. and 27 l. | 73 % more or 74 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 995 l. and 225 l. | 77 % more or 770 l. |
Engine oil volume | 65 l. and 24 l. | 63 % more or 41 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 390 kW and 120.8 kW | 69 % more or 269.2 kW |
Displacement | 18.1 l. and 6.5 l. | 64 % more or 11.6 l. |
Carrier
Support rollers number on either side | 3 and 2 | 33 % more or 1 |
2 reasons to buy Link-Belt 240LX Long Front Part:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 10.4 rev / min and 6.2 rev / min | 40 % more or 4.2 rev |
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 424 l/min and 980 l/min | 57 % less or 556 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 86189.8 kg and 27714.5 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Isuzu |
Model | C18 ACERT (ATAAC) and BB-6BG1T |
Carrier
Track shoes number per side | 51 and 51 |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 9 |
Images


