- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Hitachi ZX250H-3 vs. Volvo EC210BNC
Hitachi ZX250H-3 vs. Volvo EC210BNC
6 reasons to buy Hitachi ZX250H-3:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 13.5 rev / min and 11.6 rev / min | 14 % more or 1.9 rev |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 500 l. and 350 l. | 30 % more or 150 l. |
Motor
| Maximum torque | 673 Nm and 647 Nm | 4 % more or 26 Nm |
| Effective power | 132 kW and 107 kW | 19 % more or 25 kW |
Carrier
| Track shoes number per side | 47 and 46 | 2 % more or 1 |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 8 and 7 | 12 % more or 1 |
6 reasons to buy Volvo EC210BNC:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 55 amperes | 31 % more or 25 amperes |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 19 l/min and 224 l/min | 92 % less or 205 l/min |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 27.5 l. and 26 l. | 5 % more or 1.5 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 295 l. and 280 l. | 5 % more or 15 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 25 l. and 23 l. | 8 % more or 2 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 5.7 l. and 5.2 l. | 9 % more or 0.5 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 24700 kg and 20900 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Isuzu and Volvo |
| Model | AH-4HK1X and D6D EFE2 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 600 mm and 700 mm |
| Maximum travel speed | 5.5 km/h and 5.5 km/h |
Images
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 700 mm |