- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Hitachi ZX270-3 vs. John Deere 225C LC RTS
Hitachi ZX270-3 vs. John Deere 225C LC RTS
11 reasons to buy Hitachi ZX270-3:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 88 amperes and 50 amperes | 43 % more or 38 amperes |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 236 l/min and 388 l/min | 39 % less or 152 l/min |
| Fuel Capacity | 500 l. and 270 l. | 46 % more or 230 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 26 l. and 17 l. | 35 % more or 9 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 290 l. and 200 l. | 31 % more or 90 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 23 l. and 22 l. | 4 % more or 1 l. |
| Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 11.7 l. and 4.5 l. | 62 % more or 7.2 l. |
Motor
| Maximum torque | 676 Nm and 550 Nm | 19 % more or 126 Nm |
| Effective power | 140 kW and 108 kW | 23 % more or 32 kW |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 5.5 km/h and 5.3 km/h | 4 % more or 0.2 km/h |
| Hook traction force | 246 kN and 20410 kN | 99 % less or 20164 kN |
5 reasons to buy John Deere 225C LC RTS:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 13.3 rev / min and 12.6 rev / min | 5 % more or 0.7 rev |
Motor
| Displacement | 6.5 l. and 5.2 l. | 20 % more or 1.3 l. |
Carrier
| Track shoes number per side | 49 and 45 | 8 % more or 4 |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 8 and 7 | 12 % more or 1 |
| Specific ground pressure | 37.7 kPa and 55 kPa | 31 % less or 17.3 kPa |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 12383.1 kg and 24240 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with intercooler and Turbocharger with charge air cooler by oncoming air flow |
| Manufacturer | Isuzu and Isuzu |
| Model | AH-4HK1X and AA-6BG1T |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 600 mm and 800 mm |
| Support rollers number on either side | 2 and 2 |
Images
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 800 mm |