- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- John Deere 290D vs. Caterpillar 385B L
John Deere 290D vs. Caterpillar 385B L
2 reasons to buy John Deere 290D:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 14.9 rev / min and 6.2 rev / min | 58 % more or 8.7 rev |
Carrier
| Hook traction force | 60.8 kN and 591.7 kN | 90 % less or 530.9 kN |
10 reasons to buy Caterpillar 385B L:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1241.6 l. and 249.8 l. | 80 % more or 991.8 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 101.1 l. and 15 l. | 85 % more or 86.1 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 79.9 l. and 8.5 l. | 89 % more or 71.4 l. |
| Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 18.9 l. and 3.2 l. | 83 % more or 15.7 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 382.5 kW and 48.5 kW | 87 % more or 334.0 kW |
| Displacement | 15.8 l. and 3.9 l. | 75 % more or 11.9 l. |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 4.5 km/h and 4.2 km/h | 7 % more or 0.3 km/h |
| Track shoes number per side | 47 and 43 | 9 % more or 4 |
| Support rollers number on either side | 3 and 1 | 67 % more or 2 |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 8 and 6 | 25 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Motor
| Model | 4239D and Caterpillar 3456 ATAAC |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 500 mm and 762 mm |
Images
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 500 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 762 mm |