vs.

      John Deere 690C vs. Volvo EC240B

      2 reasons to buy John Deere 690C:

      Operation

      Hydraulic pump flow rate 318 l/min and 460 l/min 31 % less or 142 l/min

      Booms/sections features 1

      Maximum excavation depth 6400 mm and 6040 mm 6 % more or 360 mm

      5 reasons to buy Volvo EC240B:

      Sizes

      Clearance 470 mm and 380 mm 19 % more or 90 mm

      Operation

      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 34300 kPa and 17238 kPa 50 % more or 17062 kPa

      Motor

      Full power 134 kW and 100 kW 25 % more or 34 kW

      Booms/sections features 1

      Maximum radius along ground level 9710 mm and 9144 mm 6 % more or 566 mm
      Maximum loading height 8010 mm and 4572 mm 43 % more or 3438 mm

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Rear platform swing radius 2720 mm and 2940 mm
      Caterpillar track length on ground level 3020 mm and 3850 mm

      Operation

      Working weight 18115 kg and 24200 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer John Deere and Volvo

      Carrier

      Shoe dimensions 600 mm and 600 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer length 9140 mm and 10110 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 3020 mm 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 3850 mm
      5. Clearance 380 mm 5. Clearance 470 mm
      8. Rear platform swing radius 2720 mm 8. Rear platform swing radius 2940 mm

      Carrier

      14. Shoe dimensions 600 mm 14. Shoe dimensions 600 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      1. Unit load-transfer length 9140 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 10110 mm
      10. Maximum loading height 4572 mm 10. Maximum loading height 8010 mm
      11. Maximum radius along ground level 9144 mm 11. Maximum radius along ground level 9710 mm
      13. Maximum excavation depth 6400 mm 13. Maximum excavation depth 6040 mm