- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- John Deere 790 vs. Volvo EC140LC
John Deere 790 vs. Volvo EC140LC
8 reasons to buy John Deere 790:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3100 mm and 2590 mm | 16 % more or 510 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 235 l. | 22 % more or 65 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 23 l. and 17.5 l. | 24 % more or 5.5 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 310 l. and 260 l. | 16 % more or 50 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 40 l. and 23.6 l. | 41 % more or 16.4 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 116 kW and 73.5 kW | 37 % more or 42.5 kW |
| Displacement | 7.6 l. and 3.9 l. | 49 % more or 3.7 l. |
| Maximum torque | 698 Nm and 431 Nm | 38 % more or 267 Nm |
3 reasons to buy Volvo EC140LC:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 50 amperes and 42 amperes | 16 % more or 8 amperes |
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 31381 kPa and 25994 kPa | 17 % more or 5387 kPa |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 21 l/min and 480 l/min | 96 % less or 459 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 21972 kg and 13370 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
| Model | e 400 lot and B3.9-C |
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer height | 3000 mm and 2770 mm |
| Unit load-transfer length | 10000 mm and 7750 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3100 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2590 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 10000 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 7680 mm |
| 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3000 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2860 mm |