- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- John Deere 792 vs. Case CX130B LC
John Deere 792 vs. Case CX130B LC
10 reasons to buy John Deere 792:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm and 2590 mm | 19 % more or 600 mm |
Operation
Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 12 l. and 2.2 l. | 82 % more or 9.8 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 450 l. and 260 l. | 42 % more or 190 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 45 l. and 14.8 l. | 67 % more or 30.2 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 400 l. and 157 l. | 61 % more or 243 l. |
Engine oil volume | 23 l. and 17 l. | 26 % more or 6 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 134 kW and 71 kW | 47 % more or 63 kW |
Displacement | 7.6 l. and 3 l. | 61 % more or 4.6 l. |
Maximum torque | 800 Nm and 359.3 Nm | 55 % more or 440.7 Nm |
Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
4 reasons to buy Case CX130B LC:
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 258 l/min and 260 l/min | 1 % less or 2 l/min |
Generator current strength | 50 amperes and 42 amperes | 16 % more or 8 amperes |
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34301.4 kPa and 25995 kPa | 24 % more or 8306.4 kPa |
Motor
Torque measured at | 1600 rev / min and 1400 rev / min | 12 % more or 200 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Working weight | 27342 kg and 12882 kg |
Motor
Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 2000 rev / min |
Manufacturer | John Deere and Isuzu |
Model | 400 lot and 4JJ1X, III Level III certified |
Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging and cooling at the outlet |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer height | 3190 mm and 2820 mm |
Unit load-transfer length | 10890 mm and 7640 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2590 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
3. Unit load-transfer height | 3190 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2820 mm |
1. Unit load-transfer length | 10890 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 7620 mm |


