- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- John Deere 792 vs. John Deere 2054 Road Machine
John Deere 792 vs. John Deere 2054 Road Machine
8 reasons to buy John Deere 792:
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 45 l. and 23.5 l. | 48 % more or 21.5 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 400 l. and 130 l. | 67 % more or 270 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 23 l. and 19 l. | 17 % more or 4 l. |
| Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 12 l. and 4.7 l. | 61 % more or 7.3 l. |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 260 l/min and 438 l/min | 41 % less or 178 l/min |
Motor
| Displacement | 7.6 l. and 6.8 l. | 11 % more or 0.8 l. |
| Effective power | 134 kW and 105 kW | 22 % more or 29 kW |
| Maximum torque | 800 Nm and 579 Nm | 28 % more or 221 Nm |
5 reasons to buy John Deere 2054 Road Machine:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3210 mm and 3190 mm | 1 % more or 20 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1018 l. and 450 l. | 56 % more or 568 l. |
| Generator current strength | 45 amperes and 42 amperes | 7 % more or 3 amperes |
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34335.9 kPa and 25995 kPa | 24 % more or 8340.9 kPa |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2150 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 7 % more or 150 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 27342 kg and 24585 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | John Deere and John Deere |
| Model | 400 lot and 6068T |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer length | 10890 mm and 9690 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3210 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 10890 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 9690 mm |