- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- John Deere 792 vs. Kato HD1023III
John Deere 792 vs. Kato HD1023III
10 reasons to buy John Deere 792:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm and 2990 mm | 6 % more or 200 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 400 l. and 290 l. | 27 % more or 110 l. |
Engine oil volume | 23 l. and 22 l. | 4 % more or 1 l. |
Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 12 l. and 11.3 l. | 6 % more or 0.7 l. |
Generator current strength | 42 amperes and 35 amperes | 17 % more or 7 amperes |
Fuel Capacity | 450 l. and 380 l. | 16 % more or 70 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 45 l. and 23 l. | 49 % more or 22 l. |
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 260 l/min and 494 l/min | 47 % less or 234 l/min |
Motor
Maximum torque | 800 Nm and 620 Nm | 22 % more or 180 Nm |
Displacement | 7.6 l. and 5.9 l. | 22 % more or 1.7 l. |
3 reasons to buy Kato HD1023III:
Operation
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 32900 kPa and 25995 kPa | 21 % more or 6905 kPa |
Motor
Power measured at | 2150 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 7 % more or 150 rev |
Torque measured at | 1600 rev / min and 1400 rev / min | 12 % more or 200 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 27342 kg and 23000 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging |
Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Manufacturer | John Deere and Mitsubishi |
Model | 400 lot and C 6D34 TLE2A |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2990 mm |


