- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- John Deere 792 vs. Kato HD823MR
John Deere 792 vs. Kato HD823MR
4 reasons to buy John Deere 792:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm and 2820 mm | 12 % more or 370 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 450 l. and 240 l. | 47 % more or 210 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 400 l. and 260 l. | 35 % more or 140 l. |
Motor
Displacement | 7.6 l. and 5.9 l. | 22 % more or 1.7 l. |
2 reasons to buy Kato HD823MR:
Operation
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 32900 kPa and 25995 kPa | 21 % more or 6905 kPa |
Motor
Power measured at | 2050 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 2 % more or 50 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 27342 kg and 21900 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | John Deere and Mitsubishi |
Model | 400 lot and C 6D34-T |
Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging |
Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2820 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
1. Unit load-transfer length | 10890 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 8830 mm |
3. Unit load-transfer height | 3190 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2920 mm |