vs.

      John Deere 792 vs. Komatsu H285S

      2 reasons to buy John Deere 792:

      Operation

      Hydraulic pump flow rate 260 l/min and 3600 l/min 93 % less or 3340 l/min

      Motor

      Power measured at 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 10 % more or 200 rev

      6 reasons to buy Komatsu H285S:

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 6450 mm and 3190 mm 51 % more or 3260 mm

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 2960 l. and 400 l. 86 % more or 2560 l.
      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 30991.9 kPa and 25995 kPa 16 % more or 4996.9 kPa
      Fuel Capacity 4570 l. and 450 l. 90 % more or 4120 l.

      Motor

      Displacement 50.3 l. and 7.6 l. 85 % more or 42.7 l.
      Cylinders number 16 and 6 62 % more or 10

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Working weight 27342 kg and 335000 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer John Deere and Cummins
      Model 400 lot and K2000E

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer height 3190 mm and 10200 mm
      Unit load-transfer length 10890 mm and 18000 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3190 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 6450 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      1. Unit load-transfer length 10890 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 18000 mm
      3. Unit load-transfer height 3190 mm 3. Unit load-transfer height 10200 mm