vs.

      John Deere 792 vs. New Holland E485

      4 reasons to buy John Deere 792:

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 400 l. and 300 l. 25 % more or 100 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 45 l. and 39 l. 13 % more or 6 l.
      Hydraulic pump flow rate 260 l/min and 740 l/min 65 % less or 480 l/min

      Motor

      Power measured at 2000 rev / min and 1950 rev / min 2 % more or 50 rev

      7 reasons to buy New Holland E485:

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 3490 mm and 3190 mm 9 % more or 300 mm

      Operation

      Engine oil volume 38 l. and 23 l. 39 % more or 15 l.
      Fuel Capacity 663 l. and 450 l. 32 % more or 213 l.
      Generator current strength 50 amperes and 42 amperes 16 % more or 8 amperes
      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 34300 kPa and 25995 kPa 24 % more or 8305 kPa

      Motor

      Effective power 253.5 kW and 134 kW 47 % more or 119.5 kW
      Displacement 9.8 l. and 7.6 l. 22 % more or 2.2 l.

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Working weight 27342 kg and 48600 kg
      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V

      Motor

      Aspiration Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging
      Manufacturer John Deere and Isuzu
      Model 400 lot and AA-6SD1XQY
      Cylinders number 6 and 6

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer height 3190 mm and 3730 mm
      Unit load-transfer length 10890 mm and 12175 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3190 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3490 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      1. Unit load-transfer length 10890 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 12120 mm
      3. Unit load-transfer height 3190 mm 3. Unit load-transfer height 3610 mm