- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- John Deere 792 vs. New Holland E485
John Deere 792 vs. New Holland E485
4 reasons to buy John Deere 792:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 400 l. and 300 l. | 25 % more or 100 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 45 l. and 39 l. | 13 % more or 6 l. |
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 260 l/min and 740 l/min | 65 % less or 480 l/min |
Motor
Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1950 rev / min | 2 % more or 50 rev |
7 reasons to buy New Holland E485:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3490 mm and 3190 mm | 9 % more or 300 mm |
Operation
Engine oil volume | 38 l. and 23 l. | 39 % more or 15 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 663 l. and 450 l. | 32 % more or 213 l. |
Generator current strength | 50 amperes and 42 amperes | 16 % more or 8 amperes |
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34300 kPa and 25995 kPa | 24 % more or 8305 kPa |
Motor
Effective power | 253.5 kW and 134 kW | 47 % more or 119.5 kW |
Displacement | 9.8 l. and 7.6 l. | 22 % more or 2.2 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 27342 kg and 48600 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging |
Manufacturer | John Deere and Isuzu |
Model | 400 lot and AA-6SD1XQY |
Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer height | 3190 mm and 3730 mm |
Unit load-transfer length | 10890 mm and 12175 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3490 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
1. Unit load-transfer length | 10890 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 12120 mm |
3. Unit load-transfer height | 3190 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3610 mm |