vs.

      John Deere 890 vs. New Holland E265EL

      9 reasons to buy John Deere 890:

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 3600 mm and 2990 mm 17 % more or 610 mm

      Operation

      Cooling system fluid volume 72 l. and 23 l. 68 % more or 49 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 348.2 l. and 280 l. 20 % more or 68.2 l.
      Engine oil volume 34 l. and 17 l. 50 % more or 17 l.
      Hydraulic pump flow rate 208 l/min and 470 l/min 56 % less or 262 l/min
      Fuel Capacity 484.5 l. and 447 l. 8 % more or 37.5 l.

      Motor

      Effective power 186 kW and 138.7 kW 25 % more or 47.3 kW
      Displacement 10.1 l. and 6.7 l. 34 % more or 3.4 l.
      Maximum torque 1098 Nm and 800 Nm 27 % more or 298 Nm

      3 reasons to buy New Holland E265EL:

      Swing device

      Rotation speed 11 rev / min and 6 rev / min 45 % more or 5 rev

      Operation

      Generator current strength 70 amperes and 42 amperes 40 % more or 28 amperes
      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 3429710761.8 kPa and 18615 kPa 100 % more or 3429692146.8 kPa

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V
      Working weight 42040 kg and 27220 kg

      Motor

      Model 500 lot and CNH 667TA/EEG
      Power measured at 2100 rev / min and 2100 rev / min
      Torque measured at 1400 rev / min and 1400 rev / min
      Cylinders number 6 and 6

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer height 3700 mm and 3390 mm
      Unit load-transfer length 12100 mm and 10200 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3600 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 2990 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      1. Unit load-transfer length 12100 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 10100 mm
      3. Unit load-transfer height 3700 mm 3. Unit load-transfer height 3140 mm