- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- John Deere 890A vs. Komatsu PC150-5
John Deere 890A vs. Komatsu PC150-5
6 reasons to buy John Deere 890A:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3600 mm and 2490 mm | 31 % more or 1110 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 484.5 l. and 230 l. | 53 % more or 254.5 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 348.2 l. and 135 l. | 61 % more or 213.2 l. |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 189 l/min and 276 l/min | 32 % less or 87 l/min |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
| Displacement | 10.1 l. and 4.9 l. | 51 % more or 5.2 l. |
2 reasons to buy Komatsu PC150-5:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 12 rev / min and 5.5 rev / min | 54 % more or 6.5 rev |
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 31853.8 kPa and 20000 kPa | 37 % more or 11853.8 kPa |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 38555 kg and 15380 kg |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
| Model | 500 lot and S6D95L |
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Komatsu |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer height | 3700 mm and 2870 mm |
| Unit load-transfer length | 12100 mm and 8520 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3600 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2490 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 12100 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 8520 mm |
| 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3700 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2870 mm |