- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Kato HD1430IIILC vs. New Holland E135SR
Kato HD1430IIILC vs. New Holland E135SR
5 reasons to buy Kato HD1430IIILC:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3200 mm and 2490 mm | 22 % more or 710 mm |
| Clearance | 500 mm and 455 mm | 9 % more or 45 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 183 kW and 63 kW | 66 % more or 120 kW |
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum excavation depth | 6720 mm and 5500 mm | 18 % more or 1220 mm |
| Maximum loading height | 7110 mm and 6200 mm | 13 % more or 910 mm |
2 reasons to buy New Holland E135SR:
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 33000 kPa and 32900 kPa | 0 % more or 100 kPa |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 236 l/min and 602 l/min | 61 % less or 366 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear platform swing radius | 3460 mm and 1425 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 31100 kg and 14700 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi and Isuzu |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 600 mm and 500 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3200 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2490 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 500 mm | 5. Clearance | 455 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3460 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1425 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 500 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 13. Maximum excavation depth | 7400 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 5500 mm |
| 10. Maximum loading height | 7570 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 6200 mm |