- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Kato HD823MR vs. John Deere 792
Kato HD823MR vs. John Deere 792
2 reasons to buy Kato HD823MR:
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 32900 kPa and 25995 kPa | 21 % more or 6905 kPa |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2050 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 2 % more or 50 rev |
4 reasons to buy John Deere 792:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm and 2820 mm | 12 % more or 370 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 400 l. and 260 l. | 35 % more or 140 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 450 l. and 240 l. | 47 % more or 210 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 7.6 l. and 5.9 l. | 22 % more or 1.7 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 21900 kg and 27342 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi and John Deere |
| Model | C 6D34-T and 400 lot |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2820 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 8830 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 10890 mm |
| 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2920 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3190 mm |