- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Kobelco 115SR DZ vs. John Deere 790
Kobelco 115SR DZ vs. John Deere 790
2 reasons to buy Kobelco 115SR DZ:
Operation
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34335.9 kPa and 25994 kPa | 24 % more or 8341.9 kPa |
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 308 l/min and 480 l/min | 36 % less or 172 l/min |
8 reasons to buy John Deere 790:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3100 mm and 2590 mm | 16 % more or 510 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 310 l. and 168.1 l. | 46 % more or 141.9 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 40 l. and 18.2 l. | 54 % more or 21.8 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 140.1 l. | 53 % more or 159.9 l. |
Engine oil volume | 23 l. and 12.9 l. | 44 % more or 10.1 l. |
Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 12 l. and 1.7 l. | 86 % more or 10.3 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 116 kW and 62.6 kW | 46 % more or 53.4 kW |
Displacement | 7.6 l. and 4.3 l. | 43 % more or 3.3 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 14401.6 kg and 21972 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Isuzu and John Deere |
Model | A-4BG1T and e 400 lot |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer height | 2810 mm and 3000 mm |
Unit load-transfer length | 7880 mm and 10000 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2590 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3100 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
1. Unit load-transfer length | 7880 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 10000 mm |
3. Unit load-transfer height | 2810 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3000 mm |