- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Kobelco 200SR LC vs. John Deere 890A
Kobelco 200SR LC vs. John Deere 890A
3 reasons to buy Kobelco 200SR LC:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 11 rev / min and 5.5 rev / min | 50 % more or 5.5 rev |
Operation
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34335.9 kPa and 20000 kPa | 42 % more or 14335.9 kPa |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
9 reasons to buy John Deere 890A:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3600 mm and 3190 mm | 11 % more or 410 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 484.5 l. and 269.9 l. | 44 % more or 214.6 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 72 l. and 18.5 l. | 74 % more or 53.5 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 348.2 l. and 215 l. | 38 % more or 133.2 l. |
Engine oil volume | 34 l. and 12.9 l. | 62 % more or 21.1 l. |
Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume | 8.8 l. and 7.6 l. | 14 % more or 1.2 l. |
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 189 l/min and 371 l/min | 49 % less or 182 l/min |
Motor
Effective power | 579 kW and 91.7 kW | 84 % more or 487.3 kW |
Displacement | 10.1 l. and 4.3 l. | 57 % more or 5.8 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 21999.2 kg and 38555 kg |
Motor
Model | AA-4BG1TC and 500 lot |
Manufacturer | Isuzu and John Deere |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer height | 3060 mm and 3700 mm |
Unit load-transfer length | 8200 mm and 12100 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3190 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3600 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
1. Unit load-transfer length | 8180 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 12100 mm |
3. Unit load-transfer height | 3060 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3700 mm |