vs.

      Kobelco 235SR LC vs. John Deere 990

      2 reasons to buy Kobelco 235SR LC:

      Swing device

      Rotation speed 11 rev / min and 5.5 rev / min 50 % more or 5.5 rev

      Operation

      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 34335.9 kPa and 18615 kPa 46 % more or 15720.9 kPa

      10 reasons to buy John Deere 990:

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 3630 mm and 3390 mm 7 % more or 240 mm

      Operation

      Hydraulic pump flow rate 208 l/min and 420 l/min 50 % less or 212 l/min
      Fuel Capacity 541.3 l. and 291.5 l. 46 % more or 249.8 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 60.6 l. and 19 l. 69 % more or 41.6 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 832.8 l. and 230.9 l. 72 % more or 601.9 l.
      Engine oil volume 37.9 l. and 24 l. 37 % more or 13.9 l.
      Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume 8.7 l. and 7.5 l. 14 % more or 1.2 l.

      Motor

      Power measured at 2100 rev / min and 2000 rev / min 5 % more or 100 rev
      Displacement 15.7 l. and 5.9 l. 62 % more or 9.8 l.
      Effective power 193.9 kW and 110.4 kW 43 % more or 83.5 kW

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Working weight 25990.8 kg and 40052 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Mitsubishi and John Deere
      Model 6D34-TLED and 700 lot

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer height 3160 mm and 3660 mm
      Unit load-transfer length 8890 mm and 12110 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3390 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3630 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      3. Unit load-transfer height 3160 mm 3. Unit load-transfer height 3660 mm
      1. Unit load-transfer length 8890 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 12110 mm