- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Kobelco SK290 LC vs. John Deere 490
Kobelco SK290 LC vs. John Deere 490
8 reasons to buy Kobelco SK290 LC:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3400 mm and 2691.4 mm | 21 % more or 708.6 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 351 l. and 159.7 l. | 55 % more or 191.3 l. |
Engine oil volume | 32 l. and 14.2 l. | 56 % more or 17.8 l. |
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34335.9 kPa and 17581.6 kPa | 49 % more or 16754.3 kPa |
Fuel Capacity | 420 l. and 249.8 l. | 41 % more or 170.2 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 28 l. and 23.2 l. | 17 % more or 4.8 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 141.7 kW and 55.9 kW | 61 % more or 85.8 kW |
Displacement | 7.5 l. and 3.9 l. | 48 % more or 3.6 l. |
2 reasons to buy John Deere 490:
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 120 l/min and 505 l/min | 76 % less or 385 l/min |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 30095.9 kg and 11503.1 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Mitsubishi and John Deere |
Model | 6D16-TLEG and 300 lot |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3400 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2691.4 mm |