- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Kobelco SK290 LC vs. John Deere 790
Kobelco SK290 LC vs. John Deere 790
6 reasons to buy Kobelco SK290 LC:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3400 mm and 3100 mm | 9 % more or 300 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 351 l. and 300 l. | 15 % more or 51 l. |
Engine oil volume | 32 l. and 23 l. | 28 % more or 9 l. |
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34335.9 kPa and 25994 kPa | 24 % more or 8341.9 kPa |
Fuel Capacity | 420 l. and 310 l. | 26 % more or 110 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 141.7 kW and 116 kW | 18 % more or 25.7 kW |
3 reasons to buy John Deere 790:
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 480 l/min and 505 l/min | 5 % less or 25 l/min |
Cooling system fluid volume | 40 l. and 28 l. | 30 % more or 12 l. |
Motor
Displacement | 7.6 l. and 7.5 l. | 1 % more or 0.1 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 30095.9 kg and 21972 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Mitsubishi and John Deere |
Model | 6D16-TLEG and e 400 lot |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer height | 3220 mm and 3000 mm |
Unit load-transfer length | 10330 mm and 10000 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3400 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3100 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
1. Unit load-transfer length | 10160 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 10000 mm |
3. Unit load-transfer height | 4060 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3000 mm |