vs.

      Kobelco SK290 LC vs. John Deere 790

      6 reasons to buy Kobelco SK290 LC:

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 3400 mm and 3100 mm 9 % more or 300 mm

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 420 l. and 310 l. 26 % more or 110 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 351 l. and 300 l. 15 % more or 51 l.
      Engine oil volume 32 l. and 23 l. 28 % more or 9 l.
      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 34335.9 kPa and 25994 kPa 24 % more or 8341.9 kPa

      Motor

      Effective power 141.7 kW and 116 kW 18 % more or 25.7 kW

      3 reasons to buy John Deere 790:

      Operation

      Cooling system fluid volume 40 l. and 28 l. 30 % more or 12 l.
      Hydraulic pump flow rate 480 l/min and 505 l/min 5 % less or 25 l/min

      Motor

      Displacement 7.6 l. and 7.5 l. 1 % more or 0.1 l.

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Working weight 30095.9 kg and 21972 kg

      Motor

      Model 6D16-TLEG and e 400 lot
      Manufacturer Mitsubishi and John Deere

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer height 3220 mm and 3000 mm
      Unit load-transfer length 10330 mm and 10000 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3400 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3100 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      1. Unit load-transfer length 10330 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 10000 mm
      3. Unit load-transfer height 3220 mm 3. Unit load-transfer height 3000 mm