- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Kobelco SK290 LC vs. John Deere 990
Kobelco SK290 LC vs. John Deere 990
2 reasons to buy Kobelco SK290 LC:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 5.5 rev / min | 45 % more or 4.5 rev |
Operation
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34335.9 kPa and 18615 kPa | 46 % more or 15720.9 kPa |
8 reasons to buy John Deere 990:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3630 mm and 3400 mm | 6 % more or 230 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 541.3 l. and 420 l. | 22 % more or 121.3 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 60.6 l. and 28 l. | 54 % more or 32.6 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 832.8 l. and 351 l. | 58 % more or 481.8 l. |
Engine oil volume | 37.9 l. and 32 l. | 16 % more or 5.9 l. |
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 208 l/min and 505 l/min | 59 % less or 297 l/min |
Motor
Displacement | 15.7 l. and 7.5 l. | 52 % more or 8.2 l. |
Effective power | 193.9 kW and 141.7 kW | 27 % more or 52.2 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 30095.9 kg and 40052 kg |
Motor
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2100 rev / min |
Manufacturer | Mitsubishi and John Deere |
Model | 6D16-TLEG and 700 lot |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer height | 3220 mm and 3660 mm |
Unit load-transfer length | 10330 mm and 12110 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3400 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3630 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
1. Unit load-transfer length | 10330 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 12110 mm |
3. Unit load-transfer height | 3220 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3660 mm |