vs.

      Kobelco SK290 LC vs. John Deere 990

      2 reasons to buy Kobelco SK290 LC:

      Swing device

      Rotation speed 10 rev / min and 5.5 rev / min 45 % more or 4.5 rev

      Operation

      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 34335.9 kPa and 18615 kPa 46 % more or 15720.9 kPa

      8 reasons to buy John Deere 990:

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 3630 mm and 3400 mm 6 % more or 230 mm

      Operation

      Hydraulic pump flow rate 208 l/min and 505 l/min 59 % less or 297 l/min
      Fuel Capacity 541.3 l. and 420 l. 22 % more or 121.3 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 60.6 l. and 28 l. 54 % more or 32.6 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 832.8 l. and 351 l. 58 % more or 481.8 l.
      Engine oil volume 37.9 l. and 32 l. 16 % more or 5.9 l.

      Motor

      Effective power 193.9 kW and 141.7 kW 27 % more or 52.2 kW
      Displacement 15.7 l. and 7.5 l. 52 % more or 8.2 l.

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Working weight 30095.9 kg and 40052 kg

      Motor

      Power measured at 2100 rev / min and 2100 rev / min
      Manufacturer Mitsubishi and John Deere
      Model 6D16-TLEG and 700 lot

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer height 3220 mm and 3660 mm
      Unit load-transfer length 10330 mm and 12110 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3400 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3630 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      3. Unit load-transfer height 4060 mm 3. Unit load-transfer height 3660 mm
      1. Unit load-transfer length 10330 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 12110 mm