- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Kobelco SK290 LC vs. Volvo EC210BNC
Kobelco SK290 LC vs. Volvo EC210BNC
10 reasons to buy Kobelco SK290 LC:
Shovel
| Maximum bucket volume | 1.8 m3 and 1.6 m3 | 11 % more or 0.2 m3 |
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34335.9 kPa and 34300 kPa | 0 % more or 35.9 kPa |
| Fuel Capacity | 420 l. and 350 l. | 17 % more or 70 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 28 l. and 27.5 l. | 2 % more or 0.5 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 351 l. and 295 l. | 16 % more or 56 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 32 l. and 25 l. | 22 % more or 7 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 141.7 kW and 107 kW | 24 % more or 34.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1900 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
| Displacement | 7.5 l. and 5.7 l. | 24 % more or 1.8 l. |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 5.6 km/h and 5.5 km/h | 2 % more or 0.1 km/h |
2 reasons to buy Volvo EC210BNC:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 11.6 rev / min and 10 rev / min | 14 % more or 1.6 rev |
Operation
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 19 l/min and 505 l/min | 96 % less or 486 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 30095.9 kg and 20900 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi and Volvo |
| Model | 6D16-TLEG and D6D EFE2 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 800 mm and 700 mm |
Images
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 800 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 700 mm |