vs.

      Kobelco SK290 LC vs. Volvo EC240B

      4 reasons to buy Kobelco SK290 LC:

      Sizes

      Clearance 500 mm and 470 mm 6 % more or 30 mm

      Operation

      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 34335.9 kPa and 34300 kPa 0 % more or 35.9 kPa

      Booms/sections features 1

      Maximum excavation depth 7230 mm and 6040 mm 16 % more or 1190 mm
      Maximum radius along ground level 10570 mm and 9710 mm 8 % more or 860 mm

      2 reasons to buy Volvo EC240B:

      Operation

      Hydraulic pump flow rate 460 l/min and 505 l/min 9 % less or 45 l/min

      Booms/sections features 1

      Maximum loading height 8010 mm and 7150 mm 11 % more or 860 mm

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Rear platform swing radius 3070 mm and 2940 mm
      Caterpillar track length on ground level 4010 mm and 3850 mm

      Operation

      Working weight 30095.9 kg and 24200 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Mitsubishi and Volvo

      Carrier

      Shoe dimensions 800 mm and 600 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer length 10330 mm and 10110 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 4010 mm 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 3850 mm
      5. Clearance 500 mm 5. Clearance 470 mm
      8. Rear platform swing radius 3070 mm 8. Rear platform swing radius 2940 mm

      Carrier

      14. Shoe dimensions 800 mm 14. Shoe dimensions 600 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      1. Unit load-transfer length 10160 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 10110 mm
      10. Maximum loading height 6940 mm 10. Maximum loading height 8010 mm
      11. Maximum radius along ground level 11250 mm 11. Maximum radius along ground level 9710 mm
      13. Maximum excavation depth 8120 mm 13. Maximum excavation depth 6040 mm