- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Kobelco SK290 LC vs. Volvo EC240B
Kobelco SK290 LC vs. Volvo EC240B
4 reasons to buy Kobelco SK290 LC:
Sizes
Clearance | 500 mm and 470 mm | 6 % more or 30 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34335.9 kPa and 34300 kPa | 0 % more or 35.9 kPa |
Booms/sections features 1
Maximum excavation depth | 7230 mm and 6040 mm | 16 % more or 1190 mm |
Maximum radius along ground level | 10570 mm and 9710 mm | 8 % more or 860 mm |
2 reasons to buy Volvo EC240B:
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 460 l/min and 505 l/min | 9 % less or 45 l/min |
Booms/sections features 1
Maximum loading height | 8010 mm and 7150 mm | 11 % more or 860 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Rear platform swing radius | 3070 mm and 2940 mm |
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 4010 mm and 3850 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 30095.9 kg and 24200 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Mitsubishi and Volvo |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 800 mm and 600 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer length | 10330 mm and 10110 mm |
Images
Sizes
4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 4010 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3850 mm |
5. Clearance | 500 mm | 5. Clearance | 470 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 3070 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2940 mm |
Carrier
14. Shoe dimensions | 800 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
10. Maximum loading height | 7150 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 8010 mm |
11. Maximum radius along ground level | 10570 mm | 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 9710 mm |
13. Maximum excavation depth | 7230 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 6040 mm |
1. Unit load-transfer length | 10160 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 10110 mm |