vs.

      Komatsu PC1100-6 vs. John Deere 890

      9 reasons to buy Komatsu PC1100-6:

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 4600 mm and 3600 mm 22 % more or 1000 mm

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 1360 l. and 484.5 l. 64 % more or 875.5 l.
      Cooling system fluid volume 139 l. and 72 l. 48 % more or 67 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 670 l. and 348.2 l. 48 % more or 321.8 l.
      Engine oil volume 48 l. and 34 l. 29 % more or 14 l.
      Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume 21.5 l. and 8.8 l. 59 % more or 12.7 l.
      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 34323.2 kPa and 18615 kPa 46 % more or 15708.2 kPa

      Motor

      Effective power 456 kW and 186 kW 59 % more or 270 kW
      Displacement 23.2 l. and 10.1 l. 56 % more or 13.1 l.

      3 reasons to buy John Deere 890:

      Swing device

      Rotation speed 6 rev / min and 5.8 rev / min 3 % more or 0.2 rev

      Operation

      Hydraulic pump flow rate 208 l/min and 1588 l/min 87 % less or 1380 l/min

      Motor

      Power measured at 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 14 % more or 300 rev

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Working weight 103000 kg and 42040 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Komatsu and John Deere
      Aspiration Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator)
      Model SAA6D170 and 500 lot
      Cylinders number 6 and 6

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer length 16020 mm and 12100 mm
      Unit load-transfer height 6040 mm and 3700 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 4600 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3600 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      1. Unit load-transfer length 16020 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 12100 mm
      3. Unit load-transfer height 6040 mm 3. Unit load-transfer height 3700 mm