- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Komatsu PC128US-1 vs. John Deere 890
Komatsu PC128US-1 vs. John Deere 890
3 reasons to buy Komatsu PC128US-1:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 12 rev / min and 6 rev / min | 50 % more or 6 rev |
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34818.5 kPa and 18615 kPa | 47 % more or 16203.5 kPa |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
6 reasons to buy John Deere 890:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3600 mm and 2460 mm | 32 % more or 1140 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 208 l/min and 226 l/min | 8 % less or 18 l/min |
| Fuel Capacity | 484.5 l. and 135 l. | 72 % more or 349.5 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 348.2 l. and 122 l. | 65 % more or 226.2 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 10.1 l. and 3.9 l. | 61 % more or 6.2 l. |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 12700 kg and 42040 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and John Deere |
| Model | S4D102E and 500 lot |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer height | 2775 mm and 3700 mm |
| Unit load-transfer length | 7835 mm and 12100 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2460 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3600 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 7835 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 12100 mm |
| 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2775 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3700 mm |