- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Komatsu PC210LC-6 vs. John Deere 890
Komatsu PC210LC-6 vs. John Deere 890
3 reasons to buy Komatsu PC210LC-6:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 11.5 rev / min and 6 rev / min | 48 % more or 5.5 rev |
Operation
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34818.5 kPa and 18615 kPa | 47 % more or 16203.5 kPa |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
5 reasons to buy John Deere 890:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3600 mm and 3080 mm | 14 % more or 520 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 208 l/min and 412 l/min | 50 % less or 204 l/min |
Fuel Capacity | 484.5 l. and 310 l. | 36 % more or 174.5 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 348.2 l. and 166 l. | 52 % more or 182.2 l. |
Motor
Displacement | 10.1 l. and 5.9 l. | 42 % more or 4.2 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 23210 kg and 42040 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Komatsu and John Deere |
Model | S6D102 and 500 lot |
Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer height | 2970 mm and 3700 mm |
Unit load-transfer length | 9425 mm and 12100 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3080 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3600 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
1. Unit load-transfer length | 9480 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 12100 mm |
3. Unit load-transfer height | 3130 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3700 mm |


