vs.

      Komatsu PC220-6 EXCEL vs. John Deere 792

      2 reasons to buy Komatsu PC220-6 EXCEL:

      Operation

      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 31853.8 kPa and 25995 kPa 18 % more or 5858.8 kPa

      Motor

      Power measured at 2100 rev / min and 2000 rev / min 5 % more or 100 rev

      5 reasons to buy John Deere 792:

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 3190 mm and 2880 mm 10 % more or 310 mm

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 450 l. and 340 l. 24 % more or 110 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 400 l. and 166 l. 58 % more or 234 l.
      Hydraulic pump flow rate 260 l/min and 432 l/min 40 % less or 172 l/min

      Motor

      Displacement 7.6 l. and 5.9 l. 22 % more or 1.7 l.

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Working weight 21910 kg and 27342 kg

      Motor

      Cylinders number 6 and 6
      Manufacturer Komatsu and John Deere
      Model SA6D102E and 400 lot

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer height 3125 mm and 3190 mm
      Unit load-transfer length 9780 mm and 10890 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 2880 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3190 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      1. Unit load-transfer length 9840 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 10890 mm
      3. Unit load-transfer height 3280 mm 3. Unit load-transfer height 3190 mm