- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Komatsu PC240NLC-6 vs. Volvo EC210BLC
Komatsu PC240NLC-6 vs. Volvo EC210BLC
6 reasons to buy Komatsu PC240NLC-6:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 12.4 rev / min and 11.6 rev / min | 6 % more or 0.8 rev |
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34813.6 kPa and 34300 kPa | 1 % more or 513.6 kPa |
Motor
| Effective power | 117.8 kW and 107 kW | 9 % more or 10.8 kW |
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1900 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
| Displacement | 5.9 l. and 5.7 l. | 3 % more or 0.2 l. |
| Full power | 123.8 kW and 118.6 kW | 4 % more or 5.2 kW |
7 reasons to buy Volvo EC210BLC:
Shovel
| Maximum bucket volume | 1.6 m3 and 1.3 m3 | 19 % more or 0.3 m3 |
Operation
| Engine oil volume | 25 l. and 24 l. | 4 % more or 1 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 350 l. and 340 l. | 3 % more or 10 l. |
| Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 60 amperes | 25 % more or 20 amperes |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 27.5 l. and 22.2 l. | 19 % more or 5.3 l. |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 19 l/min and 432 l/min | 96 % less or 413 l/min |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 295 l. and 166 l. | 44 % more or 129 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 23900 kg and 21300 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Volvo |
| Model | SA6D102E and D6D EFE2 |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 5.5 km/h and 5.5 km/h |
| Track shoes number per side | 49 and 49 |
| Shoe dimensions | 600 mm and 700 mm |
| Support rollers number on either side | 2 and 2 |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 9 |
Images
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 700 mm |