- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Komatsu PC300LC-6 EXCEL vs. Volvo EC210BNLC
Komatsu PC300LC-6 EXCEL vs. Volvo EC210BNLC
6 reasons to buy Komatsu PC300LC-6 EXCEL:
Shovel
| Maximum bucket volume | 1.8 m3 and 1.6 m3 | 11 % more or 0.2 m3 |
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34818.5 kPa and 34300 kPa | 1 % more or 518.5 kPa |
| Fuel Capacity | 540 l. and 350 l. | 35 % more or 190 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 173 kW and 118.6 kW | 31 % more or 54.4 kW |
| Power measured at | 2050 rev / min and 1900 rev / min | 7 % more or 150 rev |
| Displacement | 7.2 l. and 5.7 l. | 21 % more or 1.5 l. |
3 reasons to buy Volvo EC210BNLC:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 11.6 rev / min and 10 rev / min | 14 % more or 1.6 rev |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 295 l. and 205 l. | 31 % more or 90 l. |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 19 l/min and 502 l/min | 96 % less or 483 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 31500 kg and 21500 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Volvo |
| Model | SAA6D108E and D6D EFE2 |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 600 mm and 700 mm |
| Maximum travel speed | 5.5 km/h and 5.5 km/h |
Images
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 700 mm |