vs.

      Komatsu PC600-7 vs. John Deere 890

      9 reasons to buy Komatsu PC600-7:

      Swing device

      Rotation speed 8.3 rev / min and 6 rev / min 28 % more or 2.3 rev

      Sizes

      Width to outside of caterpillar track 3900 mm and 3600 mm 8 % more or 300 mm

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 880 l. and 484.5 l. 45 % more or 395.5 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 360 l. and 348.2 l. 3 % more or 11.8 l.
      Engine oil volume 37 l. and 34 l. 8 % more or 3 l.
      Boom reach drive mechanism fluid volume 13 l. and 8.8 l. 32 % more or 4.2 l.
      Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure 34323.2 kPa and 18615 kPa 46 % more or 15708.2 kPa

      Motor

      Displacement 15.2 l. and 10.1 l. 34 % more or 5.1 l.
      Effective power 287 kW and 186 kW 35 % more or 101 kW

      3 reasons to buy John Deere 890:

      Operation

      Cooling system fluid volume 72 l. and 57 l. 21 % more or 15 l.
      Hydraulic pump flow rate 208 l/min and 820 l/min 75 % less or 612 l/min

      Motor

      Power measured at 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 14 % more or 300 rev

      Neutral reasons:

      Operation

      Working weight 56600 kg and 42040 kg

      Motor

      Aspiration Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator)
      Cylinders number 6 and 6
      Manufacturer Komatsu and John Deere
      Model SA6D140E-3 and 500 lot

      Booms/sections features 1

      Unit load-transfer height 4300 mm and 3700 mm
      Unit load-transfer length 12810 mm and 12100 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3900 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 3600 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      1. Unit load-transfer length 11830 mm 1. Unit load-transfer length 12100 mm
      3. Unit load-transfer height 4600 mm 3. Unit load-transfer height 3700 mm