- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Komatsu PC800SE-6 vs. John Deere 990
Komatsu PC800SE-6 vs. John Deere 990
4 reasons to buy Komatsu PC800SE-6:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 5.7 rev / min and 5.5 rev / min | 4 % more or 0.2 rev |
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 4110 mm and 3630 mm | 12 % more or 480 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 880 l. and 541.3 l. | 38 % more or 338.7 l. |
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 31371.1 kPa and 18615 kPa | 41 % more or 12756.1 kPa |
5 reasons to buy John Deere 990:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 832.8 l. and 440 l. | 47 % more or 392.8 l. |
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 208 l/min and 988 l/min | 79 % less or 780 l/min |
Motor
Displacement | 15.7 l. and 15.2 l. | 3 % more or 0.5 l. |
Cylinders number | 8 and 6 | 25 % more or 2 |
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 74880 kg and 40052 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Komatsu and John Deere |
Model | SAA6D140E and 700 lot |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer height | 4705 mm and 3660 mm |
Unit load-transfer length | 12870 mm and 12110 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 4110 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3630 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
3. Unit load-transfer height | 4705 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 3660 mm |
1. Unit load-transfer length | 12870 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 12110 mm |


