- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- New Holland E385 vs. New Holland E165
New Holland E385 vs. New Holland E165
6 reasons to buy New Holland E385:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2990 mm and 2490 mm | 17 % more or 500 mm |
| Clearance | 533 mm and 490 mm | 8 % more or 43 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34300 kPa and 24300 kPa | 29 % more or 10000 kPa |
Booms/sections features 1
| Maximum excavation depth | 6015 mm and 5640 mm | 6 % more or 375 mm |
| Maximum radius along ground level | 10155 mm and 9165 mm | 10 % more or 990 mm |
| Maximum loading height | 8674 mm and 6490 mm | 25 % more or 2184 mm |
1 reasons to buy New Holland E165:
Operation
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 262 l/min and 552 l/min | 53 % less or 290 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear platform swing radius | 3342 mm and 2510 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 4050 mm and 3090 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 36300 kg and 18700 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Isuzu and Iveco |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 600 mm and 500 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer length | 11123 mm and 8710 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2990 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2490 mm |
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 4050 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3090 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 533 mm | 5. Clearance | 490 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3342 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2510 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 500 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 10. Maximum loading height | 8942 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 6490 mm |
| 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 10435 mm | 11. Maximum radius along ground level | 9165 mm |
| 13. Maximum excavation depth | 6291 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 5640 mm |
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 11000 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 8710 mm |