- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Volvo EC210BNLC vs. Kato HD700VIILC
Volvo EC210BNLC vs. Kato HD700VIILC
12 reasons to buy Volvo EC210BNLC:
Shovel
| Maximum bucket volume | 1.6 m3 and 1.2 m3 | 25 % more or 0.4 m3 |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 295 l. and 280 l. | 5 % more or 15 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 25 l. and 17 l. | 32 % more or 8 l. |
| Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 30 amperes | 62 % more or 50 amperes |
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34300 kPa and 32819 kPa | 4 % more or 1481 kPa |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 19 l/min and 460 l/min | 96 % less or 441 l/min |
| Fuel Capacity | 350 l. and 320 l. | 9 % more or 30 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 27.5 l. and 22 l. | 20 % more or 5.5 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 118.6 kW and 92 kW | 22 % more or 26.6 kW |
| Displacement | 5.7 l. and 4.9 l. | 14 % more or 0.8 l. |
| Maximum torque | 647 Nm and 431.2 Nm | 33 % more or 215.8 Nm |
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
4 reasons to buy Kato HD700VIILC:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 13.5 rev / min and 11.6 rev / min | 14 % more or 1.9 rev |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1900 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
| Torque measured at | 1700 rev / min and 1425 rev / min | 16 % more or 275 rev |
Carrier
| Track shoes number per side | 52 and 49 | 6 % more or 3 |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 21500 kg and 19000 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Mitsubishi |
| Model | D6D EFE2 and 6D31T |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 700 mm and 600 mm |
| Support rollers number on either side | 2 and 2 |
| Maximum travel speed | 5.5 km/h and 5.5 km/h |
Images
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 700 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm |