- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- Volvo EC210BNLC vs. New Holland E200SR
Volvo EC210BNLC vs. New Holland E200SR
12 reasons to buy Volvo EC210BNLC:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 11.6 rev / min and 11 rev / min | 5 % more or 0.6 rev |
Operation
| Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 30 amperes | 62 % more or 50 amperes |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 19 l/min and 352 l/min | 95 % less or 333 l/min |
| Fuel Capacity | 350 l. and 270 l. | 23 % more or 80 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 27.5 l. and 18.5 l. | 33 % more or 9.0 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 295 l. and 167 l. | 43 % more or 128 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 25 l. and 13 l. | 48 % more or 12 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 5.7 l. and 4.3 l. | 25 % more or 1.4 l. |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
| Effective power | 107 kW and 93.2 kW | 13 % more or 13.8 kW |
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 7 | 22 % more or 2 |
| Maximum travel speed | 5.5 km/h and 5 km/h | 9 % more or 0.5 km/h |
2 reasons to buy New Holland E200SR:
Operation
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 35000 kPa and 34300 kPa | 2 % more or 700 kPa |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1900 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 21500 kg and 19900 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Isuzu |
| Model | D6D EFE2 and - 4BG1TXBFA |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharging with intercooler |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 700 mm and 600 mm |
| Support rollers number on either side | 2 and 2 |
Images
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 700 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm |