- Home/
- Comparison/
- Hydraulic Shovel/
- XCG 210LC-8 vs. Terex 1804LC
XCG 210LC-8 vs. Terex 1804LC
1 reasons to buy XCG 210LC-8:
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1900 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
6 reasons to buy Terex 1804LC:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3200 mm and 2980 mm | 7 % more or 220 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 320 l/min and 420 l/min | 24 % less or 100 l/min |
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 38000 kPa and 32000 kPa | 16 % more or 6000 kPa |
Motor
Full power | 172.3 kW and 120 kW | 30 % more or 52.3 kW |
Displacement | 7.2 l. and 6.5 l. | 10 % more or 0.7 l. |
Booms/sections features 1
Maximum excavation depth | 7400 mm and 6611 mm | 11 % more or 789 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Rear platform swing radius | 2870 mm and 3300 mm |
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3640 mm and 3885 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 20600 kg and 30500 kg |
Motor
Model | BB-6BG1T and BF6M 1013 ECP |
Manufacturer | Isuzu and Deutz |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 600 mm and 600 mm |
Maximum travel speed | 5.3 km/h and 5.3 km/h |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2980 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 3200 mm |
4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3640 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3885 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 2870 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3300 mm |
Carrier
14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
13. Maximum excavation depth | 6611 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 6900 mm |