- Home/
- Comparison/
- Medium-Sized Excavator/
- Ingersoll Rand ZX125 vs. Komatsu PC55MR-3
Ingersoll Rand ZX125 vs. Komatsu PC55MR-3
7 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand ZX125:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2500 mm and 1960 mm | 22 % more or 540 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 140 l. and 20 l. | 86 % more or 120 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 190 l. and 65 l. | 66 % more or 125 l. |
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34473.8 kPa and 26475.8 kPa | 23 % more or 7998.0 kPa |
Motor
| Displacement | 4 l. and 2.2 l. | 45 % more or 1.8 l. |
| Effective power | 70.1 kW and 28.5 kW | 59 % more or 41.6 kW |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 5.2 km/h and 4.6 km/h | 12 % more or 0.6 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Komatsu PC55MR-3:
Operation
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 140.8 l/min and 158 l/min | 11 % less or 17.2 l/min |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 8 % more or 200 rev |
Carrier
| Hook traction force | 39 kN and 82 kN | 52 % less or 43 kN |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear platform swing radius | 1300 mm and 1060 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2870 mm and 2550 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 8318 kg and 5160 kg |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 500 mm and 400 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2500 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1960 mm |
| 7. Height to cab upper part | 2870 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 2550 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1300 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1060 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 500 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 400 mm |