- Home/
- Comparison/
- Medium-Sized Excavator/
- Ingersoll Rand ZX125 vs. Volvo EC55
Ingersoll Rand ZX125 vs. Volvo EC55
8 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand ZX125:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2500 mm and 1920 mm | 23 % more or 580 mm |
Clearance | 420 mm and 380 mm | 10 % more or 40 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 190 l. and 90 l. | 53 % more or 100 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 140 l. and 9.7 l. | 93 % more or 130.3 l. |
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 34473.8 kPa and 21000 kPa | 39 % more or 13473.8 kPa |
Motor
Effective power | 70.1 kW and 38 kW | 46 % more or 32.1 kW |
Displacement | 4 l. and 2.8 l. | 30 % more or 1.2 l. |
Carrier
Maximum travel speed | 5.2 km/h and 4.3 km/h | 17 % more or 0.9 km/h |
1 reasons to buy Volvo EC55:
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 110 l/min and 158 l/min | 30 % less or 48 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 2870 mm and 2550 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 1300 mm and 1650 mm |
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2617 mm and 1950 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 8318 kg and 4910 kg |
Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Aspiration | turbocharging and natural aspiration |
Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 500 mm and 400 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2500 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1920 mm |
4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2617 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1950 mm |
5. Clearance | 420 mm | 5. Clearance | 380 mm |
7. Height to cab upper part | 2870 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 2550 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1300 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1650 mm |
Carrier
14. Shoe dimensions | 500 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 400 mm |