- Home/
- Comparison/
- Medium-Sized Excavator/
- Ingersoll Rand ZX75 vs. Komatsu PC40 MRx
Ingersoll Rand ZX75 vs. Komatsu PC40 MRx
6 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand ZX75:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 140 l. and 68 l. | 51 % more or 72 l. |
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 27992.7 kPa and 26500 kPa | 5 % more or 1492.7 kPa |
| Fuel Capacity | 130 l. and 60 l. | 54 % more or 70 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 3.1 l. and 2 l. | 35 % more or 1.1 l. |
| Effective power | 53.7 kW and 28.2 kW | 47 % more or 25.5 kW |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 5.2 km/h and 4.3 km/h | 17 % more or 0.9 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Komatsu PC40 MRx:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1960 mm and 1870 mm | 5 % more or 90 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 110 l/min and 156 l/min | 29 % less or 46 l/min |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2500 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 12 % more or 300 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2720 mm and 2590 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 1175 mm and 1060 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 7501.5 kg and 4670 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and natural aspiration |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 450 mm and 400 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1870 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1960 mm |
| 7. Height to cab upper part | 2720 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 2590 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1175 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1060 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 450 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 400 mm |