- Home/
- Comparison/
- Medium-Sized Excavator/
- Ingersoll Rand ZX75 vs. Komatsu PC95R-2
Ingersoll Rand ZX75 vs. Komatsu PC95R-2
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand ZX75:
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 156 l/min and 180 l/min | 13 % less or 24 l/min |
Carrier
Maximum travel speed | 5.2 km/h and 5 km/h | 4 % more or 0.2 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Komatsu PC95R-2:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2200 mm and 1870 mm | 15 % more or 330 mm |
Motor
Effective power | 61.5 kW and 53.7 kW | 13 % more or 7.8 kW |
Displacement | 4.4 l. and 3.1 l. | 30 % more or 1.3 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Rear platform swing radius | 1175 mm and 1510 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2720 mm and 2700 mm |
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2060 mm and 2340 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 7501.5 kg and 8750 kg |
Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 450 mm and 450 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1870 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2200 mm |
4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2060 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2340 mm |
7. Height to cab upper part | 2720 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 2700 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1175 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1510 mm |
Carrier
14. Shoe dimensions | 450 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 450 mm |