- Home/
- Comparison/
- Medium-Sized Excavator/
- Ingersoll Rand ZX75 vs. Volvo ECR58
Ingersoll Rand ZX75 vs. Volvo ECR58
7 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand ZX75:
Sizes
| Clearance | 408 mm and 370 mm | 9 % more or 38 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 140 l. and 90 l. | 36 % more or 50 l. |
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 27992.7 kPa and 24014.4 kPa | 14 % more or 3978.3 kPa |
| Fuel Capacity | 130 l. and 65 l. | 50 % more or 65 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 53.7 kW and 37.9 kW | 29 % more or 15.8 kW |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Carrier
| Maximum travel speed | 5.2 km/h and 4.3 km/h | 17 % more or 0.9 km/h |
2 reasons to buy Volvo ECR58:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2000 mm and 1870 mm | 6 % more or 130 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 129.8 l/min and 156 l/min | 17 % less or 26.2 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear platform swing radius | 1175 mm and 1000 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2060 mm and 1950 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2720 mm and 2580 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
| Working weight | 7501.5 kg and 5468.5 kg |
Motor
| Displacement | 3.1 l. and 3.1 l. |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and natural aspiration |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 450 mm and 400 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1870 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2000 mm |
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2060 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1950 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 408 mm | 5. Clearance | 370 mm |
| 7. Height to cab upper part | 2720 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 2580 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1175 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1000 mm |
Carrier
| 14. Shoe dimensions | 450 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 400 mm |