- Home/
- Comparison/
- Medium-Sized Excavator/
- Komatsu PC78MR-6 vs. John Deere 70D
Komatsu PC78MR-6 vs. John Deere 70D
1 reasons to buy Komatsu PC78MR-6:
Operation
Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 26477.9 kPa and 4412.6 kPa | 83 % more or 22065.3 kPa |
6 reasons to buy John Deere 70D:
Sizes
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2350 mm and 2320 mm | 1 % more or 30 mm |
Operation
Generator current strength | 42 amperes and 25 amperes | 40 % more or 17 amperes |
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 17.8 l/min and 160 l/min | 89 % less or 142.2 l/min |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1850 rev / min | 16 % more or 350 rev |
Displacement | 3.9 l. and 3.3 l. | 15 % more or 0.6 l. |
Effective power | 41 kW and 40.3 kW | 2 % more or 0.7 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 10 rev / min |
Operation
Working weight | 8270 kg and 6359.4 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Manufacturer | Komatsu and John Deere |
Model | S4D95LE-3 and 300 lot |
Booms/sections features 1
Unit load-transfer height | 2730 mm and 2600 mm |
Unit load-transfer length | 6200 mm and 6110 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2320 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2350 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
1. Unit load-transfer length | 6200 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 6110 mm |
3. Unit load-transfer height | 2730 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2600 mm |