- Home/
- Comparison/
- Medium-Sized Excavator/
- Volvo EC55 vs. John Deere 80
Volvo EC55 vs. John Deere 80
4 reasons to buy Volvo EC55:
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 12.1 l. and 5.7 l. | 53 % more or 6.4 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 90 l. and 8.5 l. | 91 % more or 81.5 l. |
| Hydraulic system overflow valve pressure | 21000 kPa and 13730 kPa | 35 % more or 7270 kPa |
Motor
| Torque measured at | 1600 rev / min and 1300 rev / min | 19 % more or 300 rev |
7 reasons to buy John Deere 80:
Sizes
| Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2360 mm and 1920 mm | 19 % more or 440 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 135.1 l. and 90 l. | 33 % more or 45.1 l. |
| Hydraulic pump flow rate | 17 l/min and 110 l/min | 85 % less or 93 l/min |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 60.6 l. and 9.7 l. | 84 % more or 50.9 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 41 kW and 38 kW | 7 % more or 3 kW |
| Displacement | 3.3 l. and 2.8 l. | 15 % more or 0.5 l. |
| Maximum torque | 223.7 Nm and 181 Nm | 19 % more or 42.7 Nm |
Neutral reasons:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 10 rev / min |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 4910 kg and 7124.1 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Yanmar and Yanmar |
| Model | 4TNE94-SM and 4TNE98-JCF |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Booms/sections features 1
| Unit load-transfer height | 2550 mm and 2880 mm |
| Unit load-transfer length | 5900 mm and 6120 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1920 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 2360 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
| 1. Unit load-transfer length | 5900 mm | 1. Unit load-transfer length | 6120 mm |
| 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2550 mm | 3. Unit load-transfer height | 2880 mm |