- Home/
- Comparison/
- Mini Digger/
- Bobcat 320 vs. John Deere 27D
Bobcat 320 vs. John Deere 27D
1 reasons to buy Bobcat 320:
Operation
Hydraulic pump flow rate | 30 l/min and 62.1 l/min | 52 % less or 32.1 l/min |
4 reasons to buy John Deere 27D:
Sizes
Clearance | 320 mm and 179 mm | 44 % more or 141 mm |
Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1550 mm and 980 mm | 37 % more or 570 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
Maximum excavation depth | 2620 mm and 2197 mm | 16 % more or 423 mm |
Maximum loading height | 3210 mm and 2485 mm | 23 % more or 725 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Rear platform swing radius | 1068 mm and 775 mm |
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1114 mm and 1490 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 1580 kg and 2900 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Kubota and Yanmar |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 230 mm and 300 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
Maximum cut height | 1574 mm and 4460 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 980 mm | 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track | 1550 mm |
4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1114 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1490 mm |
5. Clearance | 179 mm | 5. Clearance | 320 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1068 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 775 mm |
Carrier
14. Shoe dimensions | 230 mm | 14. Shoe dimensions | 300 mm |
Booms/sections features 1
9. Maximum cut height | 1574 mm | 9. Maximum cut height | 4460 mm |
10. Maximum loading height | 2485 mm | 10. Maximum loading height | 3210 mm |
13. Maximum excavation depth | 2197 mm | 13. Maximum excavation depth | 2620 mm |