vs.

      Bobcat 320 vs. John Deere 27D

      1 reasons to buy Bobcat 320:

      Operation

      Hydraulic pump flow rate 30 l/min and 62.1 l/min 52 % less or 32.1 l/min

      4 reasons to buy John Deere 27D:

      Sizes

      Clearance 320 mm and 179 mm 44 % more or 141 mm
      Width to outside of caterpillar track 1550 mm and 980 mm 37 % more or 570 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      Maximum excavation depth 2620 mm and 2197 mm 16 % more or 423 mm
      Maximum loading height 3210 mm and 2485 mm 23 % more or 725 mm

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Rear platform swing radius 1068 mm and 775 mm
      Caterpillar track length on ground level 1114 mm and 1490 mm

      Operation

      Working weight 1580 kg and 2900 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Kubota and Yanmar

      Carrier

      Shoe dimensions 230 mm and 300 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      Maximum cut height 1574 mm and 4460 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 980 mm 2. Width to outside of caterpillar track 1550 mm
      4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 1114 mm 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level 1490 mm
      5. Clearance 179 mm 5. Clearance 320 mm
      8. Rear platform swing radius 1068 mm 8. Rear platform swing radius 775 mm

      Carrier

      14. Shoe dimensions 230 mm 14. Shoe dimensions 300 mm

      Booms/sections features 1

      9. Maximum cut height 1574 mm 9. Maximum cut height 4460 mm
      10. Maximum loading height 2485 mm 10. Maximum loading height 3210 mm
      13. Maximum excavation depth 2197 mm 13. Maximum excavation depth 2620 mm